Dutch DNA: a threat or an enormous opportunity?

By the TEDxAmsED Content Creators - Jun 14th, 2018

Dutch DNA based education

This is the first blog/article in a series of articles where we will give more background information on the theme of the TEDxAmsterdamED event on the 31st of October.

Dutch national character is trending

You may or may not have noticed it, but nowadays we come across more and more articles about ‘Dutch national characteristics’, which would pre-eminently offer many future opportunities. To my understanding, Ricardo Semler was the first to publicly regard the Dutch characteristics as an especially suitable set of characteristics to encounter the complex future. In his new book: Tot hier en nu verder, Cees van Lotringen is in search of the DNA of his homeland. He discovered that the Dutch have a certain virtues at their disposal that enable them to establish a new Golden Age. Van Lotringen was inspired by the British historian Simon Schama, who also started a search for the DNA of the Netherlands.

We, TEDxAmstedamED are convinced that Dutch DNA, that is what we call it (mainly because of the alliteration), can play an important part. Besides historical clues, we came to this belief based on observations in education. Before we can further examine Dutch DNA in education, we will explore and define Dutch DNA from a historical perspective: development of the Netherlands.

Dutch DNA

To cut right to the chase, we believe the geographical position of the Netherlands is the source of the prominent Dutch characteristics. A flat landscape that borders the North Sea with many rivers streaming upwards into the country. Voila, the explanation for Dutch DNA. All credits to go to our famous historian Johan Huizinga, which for the first time showed a relationship between Dutch characteristics and the geographical position of the Netherlands.

As mansion owning merchants became the Dutch equivalent of castle owning knights, the Dutch never knew nobility, or the corresponding feudal system, like they did in Germany or Britain. Early on, the Dutch developed into a more egalitarian character than the surrounding European powerhouses. For ages, the guilds predominated the cities. Anyone could theoretically become a novice and work his way up to master/expert level. Equal opportunities for everyone! Common sense for trade and commerce (that goes along with Calvinism) made sure that the Dutch had such few wars. The majority of the battles, in the Eighty Years’ war, mainly fought by mercenaries armies, were situated far from the conurbation of western Holland. This was the economical centre of the Netherlands. During World War I, the Dutch remained neutral and they would have liked to have remained neutral in the World War II as well: war is bad for the economy. In addition, unlike e.g. Germany, the Netherlands has not experienced traumatic civil wars. Which in turn, resulted in a distinct positive and optimistic attitude among the common people. The notorious complaining and moping is something of the last two decennia. The downside of these developments was the absence of romantic literature and music. Although the painting industry did get a chance to bloom because any well-faring merchant wanted to eternalize him/herself on a canvas.

In the everlasting battle against the water, polder-management was the big issue. Land owners had to figure it out together (famous polder model). This difficult ‘polder-management’ evolved in the ability to work together and make compromises.

The golden age, a result of the geographical position and the fact that the Netherlands has to thank its existence to the battle for freedom, instead of the principle of power. During that time, the Netherlands achieved great levels of entrepreneurship in maritime transport, trade and slavery. It granted the Dutch, apart from immense profits, a feeling of self-consciousness and creativity. Throughout time, that sense has diminished, but has settled not too deep in our subconsciousness.

The present-day Dutchman

These historical developments had a big influence on the autonomous and outspoken people the Dutch are today. People that are unruly of hierarchical constructions, that can efficiently work together using the ‘polder model’, is creative and is entrepreneurial. In a nutshell, that is what Dutch DNA has become: a set of virtues that has apparently drawn the attention of national and international trendwatchers and visionaries who believe these characteristics are exactly what someone may need in the 21st century to take on the future.

In the Netherlands, everyone is allowed to join decision making. We will talk until a compromise that suits everyone is found. In most European countries, it is ruled out to show such bullheadedness, while we value it. Often, a secretary has the same say in decision making as the director. A trainee, that does not give his unasked opinion, has slim chances of ever becoming a wholesome employee. Take a look at what, according to expats, stands out in terms of the upbringing of Dutch kids. ‘Dutch parents are hardly authoritarian, confer with each other, barely punish their kids, do not hit their kids, stimulate their kids’ autonomy and give their kids big amount of freedom and little protection’

Long story short, most Dutch children are fully equipped with Dutch DNA. They are outspoken, autonomous mini-citizen, that are used to pave their own way and be deliberate. The individualization after WWII and the famous 60’ formed an egalitarian society, whereas equality became our wealth. We need even more outspokenness and more autonomy, let’s see what Dutch DNA can do for the Dutch educational system.

Dutch DNA in education

The current educational system and Dutch DNA can barely withstand one another. The educational system, that we inherited from the days of the industrial revolution, is aimed at the efficiency of a uniform 30-children classroom. It cares little for individual needs, differentiation or highly intelligent children. ‘Behave normally, it is crazy enough’, is a typical punchline that originates from that period.

Many aspects of the educational system have already been changed. Many schools and school boards are experimenting with various new forms of education, for which the ministry finally gives room after three decennia of top-down regulation.

We have to ask ourselves whether these changes do not come too late. Even though Dutch children belong to the most happy kids in the world and the Dutch educational system still holds up in the top 10 of best education, there is talk of alarming developments. In many schools we experience students and teachers struggling with the phenomenon of classroom-management: with uniform curricula, hierarchical aspects and too little creative possibilities. I remember what my daughter (HAVO 5), who barely receives classroom lessons anymore, said: ‘Dad, this teacher cannot keep order. The other teacher can, but he cannot explain well. And the third one smells. We are not going to listen to them!’. In reaction, teachers started saying: ‘please go and work autonomously and tell me when and if you have questions’. My other daughter (also HAVO): ‘Dad, we are not going to wait for that teacher anymore, it is sad, but he cannot do this. We search for a teacher on YouTube, that can explain it far better. We politely and urgently ask the class-nerds (which is not always an insult anymore) to make summaries. We are studying for a test with six girls on skype and we pass the test. That is how we do it nowadays.’ Need I say more? Dutch DNA in optima forma!

Unfortunately, these are frugal exceptions. However, there are more: we know schools, for example the IJburg College, where there are many outspoken and autonomous students. They contribute to their own learning route and curriculum by choosing the learning pace, choosing test-methods, choosing the way they learn, and choosing their own topics. And there are more schools that are well on their way.

At the same time, we believe the system is changing too slowly. In other words, the student of today is desperate for education that is able to change much quicker. Flexibility, differentiation and pluriformity are missing. This has to change before it is too late. Some schools barely have classes/lectures anymore, the decline in students’ level of motivation is worrisome and keeping order becomes harder and harder. The individual potential of the outspoken and autonomous student is for the most part unused.

Still, I agree with the trendwatchers I talked about earlier, there are huge opportunities for the Dutch educational system if we manage to redesign the system in such a way that the typically Dutch qualities, the Dutch DNA is used at its full potential. When a student, obviously with intensive individual accompaniment of a teacher, gets enough room and freedom to put their driving autonomy and creativity to use, then the Dutch could be climbing up the ranking, instead of slowly dropping. They could be an example for modern education, but also for how a country prepares its children/students for the complex future that is in front of us.

Then those trendwatchers will be right after all.

Ton de Langen
Managing Director TEDxAmsterdam Education (together with Ferd van den Eerenbeemt)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m-SrP6XDP0&feature=youtu.be (semler)



Gewone deugden. Samenhang in een verdeelde wereld, 2017

« Previous -